A urinal cistern flushing every twenty minutes, all weekend, in an empty office is the purest example of undue consumption in the Regulations. Nothing is broken. Nothing is being misused. Water is simply being used far in excess of what the job requires, and that is an offence under Regulation 3. The controls that prevent it are a legal requirement, not an energy-saving option.

This article covers Module 12 of the PlumbMate Water Regulations course: flush volumes and the transitional dates, the replacement rules and why suite approval constrains them, flushing devices, overflow arrangements, the backflow position at a WC, and urinal flushing rates and controls. There is a 10-question mock test at the end.

Flush volumes

Water efficiency and flush volume figures
6 litres maximum since 1 January 2001.

Replacing an old cistern

The rule has an asymmetry that catches people out. A cistern installed before 1 July 1999 may be replaced by one of similar volume — single or dual — but a single flush may not become a dual flush.

The reason is not arbitrary, and knowing it makes the rule memorable: the pan and the flushing device are approved together as a suite. A pan designed to be cleared by a 9 litre flush may not clear on 4 litres. Fitting a dual flush cistern to an old pan produces a WC that needs flushing twice, which uses more water than the single flush it replaced — the opposite of the intention.

Two related points:

Marking

Flushing devices

Three types, each with a characteristic failure:

Overflow arrangements

Every flushing cistern except a pressure flushing cistern or a urinal cistern needs a warning pipe, or a device no less effective.

Where a warning pipe is used, its outlet must discharge in a prominent position — the same principle as Module 10, that the pipe exists to inform somebody. Where it discharges over a tundish, the tundish itself must be visible. And a warning pipe may discharge into a WC pan, provided it does so into the air, not less than 150 mm above the top edge of the pan.

Internal overflows

Internal overflows are accepted as equally effective — the arrangement where an overfilling cistern spills into the pan rather than through a pipe to outside. But acceptance is conditional on a strainer at or upstream of the float valve.

That condition is the whole safety of the arrangement. An internal overflow gives no external signal at all; the only symptom is a WC that trickles. What causes a float valve to hang open is grit on the seat, so the strainer removes the commonest cause of the failure that the overflow would otherwise silently manage.

The course lists better alternatives, in rough order of usefulness: a visible tundish or indicator, an audible signal, a device that disables the flush, or one that closes off the supply. The last two are the only ones that stop the waste rather than reporting it.

Backflow at a WC

The contents of a WC pan or a urinal are fluid category 5. No surprise, but it sets the requirement.

Three acceptable arrangements:

Why a conventional WC needs nothing extra

This is the part worth understanding rather than memorising, because it explains why a fitting nobody thinks about is compliant.

A conventional suite creates a type AG air gap at the float valve, and the cistern itself is an interposed cistern. Those two together constitute a type AUK1. So a conventional WC needs no additional backflow device — the protection is built into the ordinary arrangement. It does still need a servicing valve on the inlet.

And the reason AUK1 is acceptable here despite being only category 3 against backpressure: AUK1 is 3 against backpressure and 5 against backsiphonage, and at a WC backsiphonage is the credible risk. There is nothing in a cistern capable of generating backpressure.

One further permission worth knowing: an alternative category 3 arrangement may be accepted in place of a type AG air gap — for WC flushing cisterns only, and subject to risk assessment. Narrow, specific, and not to be generalised.

Pressure flushing valve arrangements

With no cistern there is no interposed vessel, so protection has to come from a device: a permanently vented pipe interrupter not less than 300 mm above the spillover level.

And a genuine trap: the Regulator's Specification uses 300 mm above a WC pan spillover, but 150 mm above a urinal sparge outlet. Different figure, and a different datum — the sparge outlet, not a spillover level. Two numbers that look interchangeable and are not.

DC devices carry their usual conditions: no control valve downstream, vertical pipe, flow downwards, category 5 backsiphonage only.

Distributing pipes

A single distributing pipe may flush any number of WCs and urinals — but it must not serve washbasins. The same cistern may serve washbasins, provided it does so through a separate distributing pipe.

The distinction is the pipe, not the cistern. A pipe that has served a WC sparge is not a pipe you want feeding a washbasin.

Urinals

Flushing rates

The slab conversion is where the common error lives. A 2,100 mm slab is three positions — 2,100 ÷ 700 — so the rate is 3 × 7.5 = 22.5 l/h. Applying the single-urinal figure of 10 l/h to a slab because it is one physical object is the mistake, and it undersizes the flush by more than half.

Controls — the legal requirement

Unless flushed manually or electronically after use, the inlet must have a time switch and a lockable isolating valve, or an equally effective automatic device.

This is worth stating in the strongest terms: it is a legal requirement, and an uncontrolled urinal cistern contravenes the Regulations. Not a recommendation, not good practice — a contravention, on the undue consumption limb of Regulation 3.

The methods, with their honest weaknesses:

Cisternless urinals and other requirements

Putting the module together

6 litres since 2001, with a dual flush lesser volume no more than two-thirds of the largest, and no converting a single flush pan to dual because the suite was approved together. Warning pipes that inform, or internal overflows with a strainer to prevent the failure they would otherwise hide. A conventional WC already has its protection through an AUK1. And urinals controlled, because an uncontrolled one is a contravention rather than an inefficiency.

📝 10-Question Mock Test

Click an option to see whether you got it right. Explanations appear instantly — no submitting at the end.

Your score: 0 / 10
Question 1 of 10
What is the maximum lesser volume on a dual flush cistern with a 6 litre full flush?
Question 2 of 10
A single flush cistern installed in 1996 has failed. What may it be replaced with?
Question 3 of 10
What is the characteristic drawback of a drop valve or flap valve flushing device?
Question 4 of 10
Where may a pressure flushing valve not be used?
Question 5 of 10
An internal overflow discharging into the pan is accepted as no less effective than a warning pipe. On what condition?
Question 6 of 10
Why does a conventional WC suite need no additional backflow device?
Question 7 of 10
What height above the datum does a permanently vented pipe interrupter require at a WC pan, and at a urinal sparge?
Question 8 of 10
A distributing pipe flushes six WCs and four urinals. May it also serve the washbasins in the same washroom?
Question 9 of 10
What flushing rate applies to a 2,100 mm urinal slab?
Question 10 of 10
A urinal cistern in an office has no flushing control and cycles continuously. What is the position?

Two things in this module waste more water than everything else on the course combined: a drop valve passing silently into the pan, and a urinal cistern flushing an empty building. Neither shows a symptom anybody notices, which is exactly why the Regulations legislate for both.

The one to carry away: an uncontrolled urinal cistern contravenes the Regulations. Time switch and lockable isolating valve, or an equally effective automatic device — it is a legal requirement, not a saving.